Wrington ARCHIVE Preliminary report into the concept of ‘Shared Space’ within a 20 mph Zone for Wrington page 2 |
Area within the proposed 20mph zone It is important to recognise that the existing area within the proposed zone is already substantially sub-standard in highway terms. Many of the roads have no associated footways and those that do have footways are frequently of limited and very substandard width where pedestrians cannot pass without walking into the road. Frequently obstructions to these footways are encountered that force pedestrians into the road, so they are of limited benefit, only serving to reinforce the idea that this is a road, which in turn encourages greater vehicle speeds: |
||||||||||||||
Many junctions in the village such as the exits from The Triangle and Chapel Hill presently have extremely limited and totally sub-standard visibility. To apply modern highway standards to any new development within this zone is therefore inconsistent and out of character. Application of modern highway standards would be counter-productive and encourage an increase in traffic speeds which would perversely be less safe. Many of the areas within this zone are effectively already Shared Space areas that we take for granted and use accordingly, such as the High Street, the area outside the off-licence and scout hut, and from Broad Street to the chemist. There are however three areas within this zone that do require attention: 1. Silver Street outside the recreation ground where the existing wide carriageway, kerbed footway and ample visibility lead to excessive traffic speeds. This could be addressed as part of the development of Brook House. 2. Broad Street. With so much space available there is a very exciting opportunity for a community project to establish a completely redefined area, to include a new quasi village square that could possibly incorporate farmers and other markets, and fairs. The Dickens evenings at Christmas have shown the energy and support that is available in the village to encourage such activity. 3. School Road. The area around the school and the wide approach from the village that encourages increased speed could all be addressed as part of a Shared Space project. This is a problematic area but there are very similar examples in Holland and France that have adopted the ‘Shared Space’ approach to solve the problem associated with traffic and children at the school that are worthy of further study. Proposed Actions 1. The first step of the nine-step process outlined in ‘Shared Space Room for Everyone’ is for political acceptance of the concept and acceptance that there is an area in the village that should be allocated as public, social space within a 20 mph zone, rather than traffic space. No other steps can be taken without this vision and adoption of this policy as step one. 2. Following the above make an application to North Somerset Council to agree to consult, advertise and make the 20mph Order. 3. Object to the current inappropriate highway proposals associated with the Brook House development. The current proposals incorporate a visibility splay around the bend in Silver Street, reducing the wall height to improve visibility for cars and with a new and unnecessary separate footway set back into the site behind a highway verge. By removing the wall, the improved visibility will inevitably increase traffic speeds further and increase the risk of accidents. It is vital for road safety to retain the status quo and keep this wall. There is a benefit to the Brook House site in increasing the developable area of a cramped site. This could fund a request to the developer to enter into a Section 106 Agreement to develop a scheme to improve Silver Street as a first step towards the creation of a 20 mph zone as outlined previously. 4. Oppose any further traffic management proposals by North Somerset Council within the proposed 20mph zone. The recent introduction of pedestrian road markings in Silver Street from Lawrence Road to the Village Hall attempts to provide a segregated but inadequate pedestrian zone which emphasises separation. For cars these markings reinforce the idea that this is a road for which they have priority. For pedestrians this provides a false sense of security, and does not enhance their safety. As the zone is usually subject to parked vehicles, pedestrians are forced to walk in the road in any event. Further schemes in the village that attempt such segregation would be similarly counter-productive and should be resisted. |
||||||||||||||
5. Resist any proposals for engineered traffic calming that have been mooted recently, This would involve red paint, standard traffic signs, and speed humps, bumps and chicanes. Any such engineered and urbanised schemes would be completely out of character with the village and would be a retrograde step. 6. Sign Audit. Removal of all road markings and traffic signs other than street nameplates and the gradual introduction of landmarks and public art would enhance the social value of the space and make it even more attractive for pedestrians. There are many meaningless traffic signs that merely detract from the attractiveness of the village whilst doing nothing to promote improved road safety. Even the authorities in the City of Phoenix, Arizona recognise that ‘children at play signs are generally disregarded by motorists and give pedestrians a false sense of security’. |
||||||||||||||
Excessive signage at Silver Street . The lack of footway is not unusual in Wrington. Note that the adjacent properties would require Planning permission even to change their windows. Such Planning consultation was unnecessary to erect the signs. |
||||||||||||||
Conclusions The design of the roads through the village must not be left solely to the Street Authorities Highway and Traffic Engineers. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ‘Shared Space Room for Everyone’ can be downloaded as a pdf file from www.shared-space.org/files/14445/SharedSpace_Eng.pdf Reusrgence magazine published an interesting article by a Local Councillor in Stroud who has very neatly summarised the concept of Shared Space in his article ‘Green Streets are ‘Naked’ Streets’ and describes his conversion to the project. This can be viewed on www.resurgence.org/selection/booth0306.htm. |
||||||||||||||